Return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in professional soccer players
Introduction
The time to return to play and the ability to continue sport activity with time are two important outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, especially in young sportsmen. Nevertheless no consensus is available regarding the optimal rehabilitation length [1] and the return to play definition [2]. These issues are more controversial when considering the outcomes related to single sports. In 2011 a systematic review by Warner et al. [3], evaluating sport-specific outcomes after ACL reconstruction, reported only three studies presenting the results in soccer players [4], [5], [6]. The authors concluded that “identifying sport-specific differences in ACL reconstruction outcomes in athletes could lead to more effective rehabilitation programs for all these athletes after surgery” and it will “provide orthopedic surgeons the ability to accurately inform patients about what they should plan to expect after surgery in terms of performance level and timing of return to sport” [3], thus underlying the need for further sport specific studies. Furthermore, different interpretations have been attributed to the “return to sport” outcome, ranging from return to perform sport-specific gestures, restore pre-injury activity level, return to train or return to official match. Often, the precise definition is not even reported.
The main objective of this study was to report the time to return to sport after ACL reconstruction in a homogenous group of competitive football players treated with the same surgical technique and rehabilitative programme and the rate of sport activity four years after the surgery.
Section snippets
Material and method
Between January and June 2009 all the patients satisfying the following inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study:
- •
ACL lesion; and
- •
male professional soccer player, involved in competitive sport activity more than 4 days per week on regular bases and attending the main divisions of Italian Soccer League.
Exclusion criteria were:
- •
posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) lesion;
- •
grade III medial collateral ligament (MCL) lesion;
- •
lateral collateral ligament (LCL) lesion;
- •
unstable contralateral knee;
- •
systemic
Results
All patients (100%) were available for on-going clinical evaluations and at the 4-year follow-up. The mean age at time of surgery was 22.9 ± 5.4 (Table 1). Four patients (19%) had a history of medial or lateral partial meniscectomy on the interested knee and three (15%) of contralateral ACL reconstruction, while 12 patients (57%) underwent at least one concurrent procedure combined to ACL reconstruction (Table 2).
The side-to-side difference in manual maximum displacement test performed with a
Discussion
In the present study the outcomes of a homogenous group of male professional soccer players, who underwent ACL reconstruction with the same technique and rehabilitative protocol, are presented using a validated clinical score and precise definition of “return to sport”. Regarding the latter outcome, a 2011 meta-analysis of Arden et al. [10] reported 7.3 (range 2–24) months as the mean time needed to return to sport in general population, even though different end-points were used. Few studies
Conclusions
The ACL reconstruction with non-anatomical double-bundle hamstring technique, combined with a patient-tailored target-based rehabilitation, allowed 95% and 62% of professional male soccer players to return to the same professional sport activity 1 year and 4 years after surgery respectively. However, overall, 71% were still able to play competitive soccer at any level at final follow-up. The clinical scores were restored to pre-injury status since 6 months, while return to play in official match
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no personal or financial conflict of interests during the study execution and manuscript preparation.
Acknowledgment
The authors are grateful to Costanza Musiani, MD and Giada Lullini, MD for their support.
References (16)
- et al.
Sport-specific outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Arthroscopy
(2011) - et al.
Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings
Arthroscopy
(2003) - et al.
Evidence-based rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
(2010) - et al.
Clinical outcomes and return-to-sports participation of 50 soccer players after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction through a sport-specific rehabilitation protocol
Sports Health
(2012) - et al.
Soccer after anterior cruciate ligament injury—an incompatible combination? A national survey of incidence and risk factors and a 7-year follow-up of 310 players
Acta Orthop Scand
(1995) - et al.
High prevalence of osteoarthritis 14 years after an anterior cruciate ligament tear in male soccer players: a study of radiographic and patient relevant outcomes
Ann Rheum Dis
(2004) - et al.
Anterior cruciate ligament injury in elite football: a prospective three-cohort study
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
(2011) - et al.
Single-bundle patellar tendon versus non-anatomical double-bundle hamstrings ACL reconstruction: a prospective randomized study at 8-year minimum follow-up
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
(2011)
Cited by (84)
Functional outcomes of a criterion-based rehabilitation protocol for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in amateur athletes: A randomised clinical trial
2023, Journal of Bodywork and Movement TherapiesTreatment of ACL injury in a professional soccer player during COVID-19 lockdown
2022, Apunts Sports MedicineRelationship between lower limb EMG activity and knee frontal plane projection angle during a single-legged drop jump
2021, Physical Therapy in SportCitation Excerpt :Studies have found ACL injury rates of 0.45 and 1.17 per 1000 athlete exposures (AEs) in collegiate male and female soccer players respectively, and 0.80 and 2.12 per 1000 AEs in collegiate male and female basketball players (Anderson et al., 2019). ACL injuries can have consequences such as six to nine months' time lost, not returning to the previous competitive level, or early osteoarthritis with a significant impact on the athlete's health and performance (Lohmander et al., 2007; Waldén et al., 2016; Zaffagnini et al., 2014). One of the most common injury mechanisms to suffer an ACL injury is the dynamic knee valgus during sports maneuvers, such as single-legged landing after a jump (Bisciotti et al., 2019; Pfeifer et al., 2018).
Surgical therapy of anterior cruciate ligament injuries: reconstruction or primary repair and InternalBrace<sup>TM</sup> augmentation?- a narrative review
2021, Sports Orthopaedics and TraumatologyDoes delayed onset muscle soreness affect the biomechanical variables of the drop vertical jump that have been associated with increased ACL injury risk? A randomised control trial
2021, Human Movement ScienceCitation Excerpt :In England the rate of public ACL reconstructions was 24.2 /100000 population in the years 2016–17 (Abram et al., 2020), while in the US the mean lifetime cost for a patient undergoing ACL reconstruction was $38,121 as of the year 2012 (Mather 3rd et al., 2013). ACL injury also has significant impact on an athlete's career with the period of rehabilitation taking up to 6–12 months (Notarnicola et al., 2016; Zaffagnini et al., 2014), and only 65% of individuals returning to their previous level of play (Ardern, Taylor, Feller, & Webster, 2014). The incidence and subsequent impact of ACL injury may be reduced by the identification of ACL injury risk factors, as this may help in the development of effective injury prevention interventions (Gagnier, Morgenstern, & Chess, 2013; Takahashi & Okuwaki, 2017).