Journal Information
Vol. 46. Issue 170.
Pages 73-79 (April - June 2011)
Share
Share
More article options
Vol. 46. Issue 170.
Pages 73-79 (April - June 2011)
Full text access
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation on the tibialis anterior vs viscoelastic surface in the re-education of ankle proprioception. A pilot study
Visits
653
Laura Martín-Casadoa,
Corresponding author
laura.martincasado@uclm.es

Autora para correspondencia. laura.martincasado@uclm.es
, Juan Avendaño-Coyb, José Manuel Fernández Rodríguezb, Luis M. Alegrec, Xavier Aguadod
a Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte, Grupo de Biomecánica Humana y Deportiva, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, España
b Escuela Universitaria de Enfermería y Fisioterapia, Grupo de Biomecánica Humana y Deportiva, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, España
c Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte, Grupo de Biomecánica Humana y Deportiva, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, España
d Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte, Grupo de Biomecánica Humana y Deportiva, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, España
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Statistics
Objective

To analyse the differences in the path of the centre of pressures during the performance of 3 static balance tests, which included two of the techniques used in the rehabilitation of ankle sprain rehabilitation.

Material and method

Fourteen healthy subjects, without ligament loosening in the ankle were recruited for the study (8 male and 6 female) voluntary participated in this study, all of them physically active, with a mean age of 19.9±3.8 years. The path of the centre of pressures was measured during monopodal balance tests on a force platform (60 s last), in three different conditions: on stable surface (force platform), on a viscoelastic surface, and during the application of electrical stimulation on the tibialis anterior muscle.

Results

The anterior-posterior path of the centre of pressures was greater in the test with electrical stimulation than in the tests on the stable surface (P<.01), and on the viscoelastic surface (P<.05).The mean position of the centre of pressures was more lateral (53.00±7.60mm) and more posterior (128.40±10,70mm) in the test on the viscoelastic surface. The greatest excursion areas of the centre of pressures were found in the test with neuromuscular electrical stimulation (1115.96±411.40mm2).

Conclusions

Greater anterior-posterior path length and excursion areas and a more posterior mean position of the centre of pressures were found in the neuromuscular electrical stimulation test. We also found greater total excursions and velocity, and a more lateral mean position of the centre of pressures in the viscoelastic surface tests.

Apunts Sports Medicine
Article options
Tools

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?