Journal Information
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
689
Original Article
Full text access
Impact and costs of injuries in professional basketball: Insights from a four-season analysis
Visits
689
Adrián Rubio-Jiméneza,b, Javier Peñac,d,
Corresponding author
javier.pena@uvic.cat

Corresponding author at: Sport and Physical Activity Studies Centre (CEEAF), C. Antoni Vilà Cañellas s/n, 08500 Vic, Spain.
, Adriá Sabataa, Toni Caparróse, Martí Casalse
a Bàsquet Manresa, Professional Basketball Club, Manresa, Spain
b University of Vic – Central University of Catalonia, Faculty of Health Sciences and Welfare, Vic, Spain
c Sport and Physical Activity Studies Centre (CEEAF), University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVic-UCC), Barcelona, Spain
d Sport Performance Analysis Research Group, University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVic-UCC), Barcelona, Spain
e Department of Sports Sciences, Institut Nacional d'Educació Física de Catalunya (INEFC), Barcelona, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (1)
Tables (5)
Table 1. General description of participants by age, height, and weight, categorized by season and competition type.
Table 2. Definitions of injury epidemiology variables used in the study.
Table 3. Total injury frequencies and severity by competition type (DC vs. SC).
Table 4. Economic impact of injuries.
Table 5. Injury costs by body region.
Show moreShow less
Additional material (1)
Abstract

Injuries in professional basketball affect player performance and generate significant costs. This study analyzed the incidence and economic impact of 102 injuries in a team from the ACB League over four seasons, with an injury rate of 5.85 injuries per 1,000 hours, higher during games. Muscle injuries (42 %), mainly involving hamstrings and the Achilles tendon, were the most common. Although 68.6 % were minor (1-7 days), severe injuries (>28 days) accounted for the highest economic burden. Single-competition seasons exhibited a higher budgetary impact (6.5 %) compared to dual-competition seasons (4.5 %).

The findings highlight the importance of preventive programs tailored to the competitive demands and player characteristics.

Keywords:
Injury incidence
Muscle injuries
Injury prevention
Economic impact
Number of competitions
Full Text
Introduction

Professional basketball, one of the most physically demanding sports, poses a high risk of injuries that affect player performance, team results, and associated costs.2 Factors such as competitive load, a tight schedule, and individual player characteristics are key determinants in the incidence and severity of these injuries.8 While the NBA has extensively studied game congestion and other risk factors7, the European ACB League, despite its competitive level, remains under-researched.

Previous studies associate high and low training loads with an increased risk of injuries, especially in highly demanding competitive seasons.4,14 However, the literature on European basketball is still limited compared to other leagues, leaving a significant gap in understanding how these dynamics affect high-level teams.7,11

This study examines the incidence and economic impact of injuries in an ACB League team over four consecutive seasons, assessing how differences between single-competition and dual-competition seasons influence injury patterns and associated costs, aiming to provide data to improve injury prevention and management.

Methodology

A descriptive observational study was conducted over four consecutive seasons (2020-2024) with a Spanish ACB League team competing in one or two competitions (ACB and/or FIBA Champions League). A total of 33 players participated, with details of age, height, and weight presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

General description of participants by age, height, and weight, categorized by season and competition type.

Season  2020-2021 ACB  2021-2022 ACB+FIBA  2022-2023 ACB+FIBA  2023-2024 ACB  Overall Average 
12  13  12  13  12.5 
Age (years)  27.88 ± 4.12  24.69 ± 3.98  25.95 ± 4.24  26.64 ± 3.87  26.29 ± 4.05 
Height (m)  1.96 ± 0.06  1.96 ± 0.07  1.99 ± 0.09  1.97 ± 0.06  1.97 ± 0.08 
Weight (kg)  91.44 ± 9.25  89.25 ± 8.74  94.11 ± 10.32  93.07 ± 9.76  91.97 ± 9.51 

Player Distribution: n=4 participated in all four seasons.

  • n = 3 participated in three seasons.

  • n =3 participated in two seasons.

  • n = 22 participated in one season only.

All procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Vic (024/2021) following the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Data included injuries, games, training sessions, and salaries, collected from the club's medical records and supplemented with salary information based on.6,15 Injuries were classified according to OSICS v10.1, following international guidelines.1,12 Definitions of "time-loss injury" (TLI) and "return to play" (RTP) were based on UEFA standards.9 Variables related to injury epidemiology used in the study are defined in Table 2.

Table 2.

Definitions of injury epidemiology variables used in the study.

Injuries
Injuries  Total number of injuries per player. 
Diagnose  Classification of injuries into categories such as muscular, joint-related, tendinous, among others. 
Affected Area  Parts of the body affected, identified as knee, ankle, shoulder, etc. 
Type  Categorized by their cause and progression: acute overuse results from excessive or repetitive strain over a short period, progressive overuse develops gradually from chronic strain, and trauma occurs suddenly due to external forces or impacts. 
Severity  Classification of injuries as mild (1–7 days), moderate (8–28 days), or severe (>28 days), following the classification proposed by van Mechelen et al.17
Player Activity
Games Played  Total number of games played, including both official and friendly games, throughout the season. 
Training Sessions  Total number of training sessions recorded over the season. 
Physical Exposure Hours  Total accumulated hours of physical exposure for players throughout the season, including both training and games. 
Injury Costs
Indirect Cost  Indirect costs derived from lost activity days, calculated using the formula by Ekstrand et al.9: Indirect Cost per Injury = (Annual Salary / Total Activity Days) × Days Lost. 
Cost per Incidence  Estimated cost per incidence of injury per 1,000 hours of exposure, linking injury frequency with its indirect economic impact. 

The statistical analysis employed a robust methodology to evaluate injury data comprehensively. Absolute and relative frequencies were used for qualitative variables, while measures of central tendency and dispersion provided insights into quantitative variables. Key metrics such as incidence rates (IR) and injury burden (IB) were calculated per 1,000 hours of exposure, allowing for a detailed breakdown by injury type, severity, anatomical location, age group, and player position. Confidence intervals (95 % CI) were determined using a Poisson distribution to ensure the precision of estimates. All analyses were conducted with SPSS v21 and R v3.4, ensuring accurate and reliable results.

Results

A total of 102 injuries were recorded among 33 players over four seasons, with an average of 25.5 injuries per season and an incidence rate (IR) of 5.63 injuries per 1,000 hours (95 % CI: 3.45–7.82) (Table 3). The incidence rate was significantly higher during games (122.28/1,000 hours) compared to training sessions (3.05/1,000 hours). Single-competition (SC) seasons exhibited higher injury rates (9.86/1,000 hours) compared to dual-competition (DC) seasons (5.73/1,000 hours) (Supplementary Tables S2 and S3).

Table 3.

Total injury frequencies and severity by competition type (DC vs. SC).

Total  %Total  Doble competiciónÚnica competición
N  %  N  %  N  % 
Total injuries  100  48  47.1  54  52.9 
MomentTraining/Practice  54  52.9  29  28.4  25  24.5 
Game  47  46.1  18  17.6  29  28.4 
Type of injuryAcute overuse  69  67.6  25  24.5  44  43.1 
Progressive overuse  23  22.5  12  11.8  11  10.8 
Trauma  10  9.8  6.9  2.9 
MechanismNon-contact  52  51.0  32  31.4  20  19.6 
Direct contact  26  25.5  10  9.8  16  15.7 
Indirect contact  33  32.4  14  13.7  19  18.6 
SeverityMild  70  68.6  28  27.5  42  41.2 
Moderate  15  14.7  7.8  6.9 
Severe  17  16.7  11  10.8  5.9 
DiagnoseMuscle strain:  32  31.4  16  15.7  16  15.7 
Hamstrings  14  13.7  4.9  8.8 
Adductor  14  13.7  7.8  5.9 
Sprain  18  17.6  8.8  16.7 
Muscle Overload  18  17.6  8.8  16.7 
Contusion  12  11.8  3.9  14.8 
Tendinopathy  8.8  2.0  13.0 
Tendon Rupture  2.0  0.0  3.7 
Arthtitis  4.9  2.9  3.7 
Fracture  2.9  2.0  1.9 
Non-specific  1.0  1.0  0.0 
Injury Frequencies and Severity

Non-contact injuries were the most frequent, with minor injuries (1-7 days) comprising 68.6 % of all cases. However, severe injuries (>28 days), though less common (16.7 %), resulted in a cumulative loss of 891 days of player activity. SC seasons showed a higher prevalence of acute injuries (43.1 %) compared to DC seasons (Table 3).

Injury types and anatomical distribution

Muscle injuries accounted for 42 % of all cases, primarily affecting the hamstrings and Achilles tendon, followed by joint (14.7 %) and ligament injuries (10.7 %) (Supplementary Table S5). The lower leg was the most frequently affected area, with an injury burden (IB) of 18.61 days/1,000 hours (95 % CI: 16.62–20.59), followed by the hamstrings (11.26 days/1,000 hours) and the knee (4.31 days/1,000 hours).

Incidence by position and age

Guards had the highest incidence rate (1.60 injuries/1,000 hours), while centers had the lowest (0.94/1,000 hours) (Supplementary Table S7). Players aged 23-28 years experienced the highest number of injuries, accounting for 58.82 % of cases. However, players over 35 years had the highest player-to-injury ratio (2.75), reflecting a reduced recovery capacity and increased prevalence of chronic injuries. (Supplementary Table S8).

Economic impact of injuries

The total indirect cost of injuries amounted to €843,000, equivalent to 7.03 % of the average annual budget. Single-competition (SC) seasons had a higher relative impact (6.5 %) compared to dual-competition (DC) seasons (4.5 %). Salary costs for lost days decreased from 9.43 % in the 2020-2021 season to 4.44 % in the 2023-2024 season, reflecting improvements in injury management (Table 4).

Table 4.

Economic impact of injuries.

Season  Competition  Total Exposure (h)  Indirect Cost (€)  % of Annual Budget  Total Incidence (injuries/1,000 h)  Estimated Cost per Incidence / 1,000 h (€) 
2020-2021  ACB  4,782  271,655 €  9 %  7.1  21,300 € 
2021-2022  ACB + BCL  4,172  242,915 €  3 %  7.2  21,600 € 
2022-2023  ACB + BCL  4,203  213,455 €  6 %  5.7  17,100 € 
2023-2024  ACB  4,955  181,432 €  4 %  2.8  840 € 

Achilles tendon injuries were the most expensive (€228,900), followed by foot injuries (€172,800) (Table 5). For a detailed breakdown of the economic impact by body region, see Supplementary Table S9, which highlights that Achilles tendon injuries accounted for 7.63 % of the total cost. Similarly, Supplementary Table S10 demonstrates how inactivity days influenced the percentage of salary costs per player, showing a progressive decline from 2020 to 2024.

Table 5.

Injury costs by body region.

Body Region  % of Total InjuriesTotal Days Lost  Indirect Cost (€)  Estimated Cost per Incidence (€) 
Lower Leg / Achilles Tendon7.63 %  95  €228,900  €1,728 
Foot / Toe5.76 %  95  €172,800  €1,728 
Hamstrings3.67 %  70  €110,100  €1,272 
Wrist / Hand / Finger / Thumb2.42 %  42  €72,600  €726 
Knee1.91 %  35  €57,300  €612 
Hip / Groin1.63 %  27  €48,900  €467 
Ankle1.62 %  32  €48,600  €552 
Lower Back / Pelvis / Sacrum1.40 %  32  €42,000  €552 
Quadriceps0.88 %  14  €26,400  €242 
Shoulder / Clavicle0.67 %  14  €20,100  €242 
Face0.44 %  10  €13,200  €173 
Neck / Cervical Spine0.04 %  €1,200  €17 
Thigh0.03 %  €900  €12 

Fig. 1 graphically represents the distribution of injury costs by body region, providing a clear overview of the economic impact associated with different types of injuries.

Fig. 1.

Graphical representation of cost and percentage distribution by body region.

(0.26MB).
Discussion

This study confirms that while exposure time in training sessions results in a higher overall injury incidence, games exhibit significantly higher rates when adjusted for exposure hours (122.28 vs. 3.05 injuries/1,000 hours). These findings align with previous research highlighting the competitive intensity and increased contact risk during games as key factors (4; Crespo et al., 2021).

Single-competition (SC) seasons demonstrated a higher incidence rate (9.86 injuries/1,000 hours) than dual-competition (DC) seasons (5.73 injuries/1,000 hours). This difference is likely due to the increased focus on intensive training in SC seasons, compared to the more frequent recovery periods facilitated by DC schedules.14

From a game position perspective, guards experienced the highest injury incidence (1.60 injuries/1,000 hours), reflecting the physical demands of their role, including explosive movements and rapid directional changes. These findings corroborate studies linking dynamic positions with elevated injury risks.10 Conversely, centers showed the lowest incidence (0.94/1,000 hours), likely due to reduced exposure to high-velocity movements.

Players aged 23-28 accounted for the majority of injuries (58.82 %), consistent with their being the largest group in the sample. However, older players (>35 years) had the highest player-to-injury ratio (2.75), highlighting their diminished recovery capacity and prevalence of chronic injuries, as seen in prior studies.5,16

Muscle injuries (42 %), particularly in the hamstrings and Achilles tendon, were the most common and costly. This underscores the need for specific preventive programs targeting these vulnerable areas.3,9 Although 68.6 % of injuries were mild, severe injuries (>28 days) accounted for the greatest economic and temporal burden, with 891 days lost across four seasons. This finding highlights the critical importance of reducing the severity of injuries, not just their incidence (Tables S8 and S9).

Economically, Achilles tendon and hamstring injuries posed the greatest financial burden, with combined costs exceeding €339,000. Moreover, SC seasons had a relatively greater impact on annual budgets (6.5 %) compared to DC seasons (4.5 %), attributable to increased training loads (Tables S9 and S10). These results align with existing literature emphasizing the disproportionate cost of severe injuries in both time and financial resources.13,16

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that injuries in professional basketball are more frequent during games and have a higher incidence in single-competition (SC) seasons, likely due to increased training loads. In contrast, dual-competition (DC) seasons showed lower injury rates, potentially due to more structured recovery periods. Muscle injuries, particularly in the hamstrings and Achilles tendon, were the most common and costly, while severe injuries (>28 days), though less frequent, had the greatest economic and time-loss impact.

These findings underscore the critical need for preventive programs tailored to mitigate both the incidence and severity of injuries, especially in high-risk areas. Adjustments to training and recovery protocols should be prioritized to optimize player performance and reduce the associated economic burden.

Future research should focus on evaluating the effectiveness of tailored preventive programs that adjust training loads and recovery strategies based on competitive formats. Additionally, exploring the influence of factors such as player position, age, and injury history on injury patterns would provide a more comprehensive understanding. Expanding the analysis to include multiple teams could enhance the generalizability of the findings and contribute to the development of league-wide injury prevention strategies.

Limitations

This study presents some limitations, primarily the sample size, as it focuses on a single professional team, which may limit the generalization of the results to other competitive contexts. Additionally, while four seasons were analyzed, differences in schedules and specific conditions of each year could have influenced the findings. Finally, data on variables such as players' prior injury history or external factors, such as changes in training intensity, were not included, which could have provided greater depth to the analysis.

Funding

The author, A.R, received funding to conduct this study from the Industrial Doctorate Plan from the Government of Catalonia, under the grant: [2020/DI/00056]. The funders had no role in the study design, the data collection and analyses, in the decision to publish, or in the manuscript preparation.

Acknowledgements

We extend our gratitude to the medical and technical staff of Bàsquet Manresa for their support and provision of essential data, as well as to the players for their participation and commitment. We also thank the Vic-Central University of Catalonia and its ethics committee for their support, and to our colleagues whose feedback enriched this study.

References
[1]
R Bahr, B Clarsen, W Derman, et al.
International Olympic Committee consensus statement: methods for recording and reporting of epidemiological data on injury and illness in sport 2020.
Br J Sports Med, 54 (2020), pp. 372-389
[2]
C Bolling, W Van Mechelen, HR Pasman, E. Verhagen.
Context matters: revisiting the first step of the ‘sequence of prevention’ of sports injuries.
Sports Med, 48 (2018), pp. 2227-2234
[3]
T Bove, G Rodas, C Pedret, et al.
Analysis of the injuries of a professional basketball team during 22 seasons attended by the same physiotherapist.
Apunts Med Esport, 54 (2019), pp. 139-147
[4]
T Caparrós, E Alentorn-Geli, GD Myer, et al.
The relationship of practice exposure and injury rate on game performance and season success in professional male basketball.
J Sports Sci Med, 15 (2016), pp. 397-402
[5]
Chou PH, Yeh YT, Wei CT, Su SB. Determining whether age retirement for NBA players is associated with injuries and illnesses: a retrospective study. Res Square. 2020. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-22500/v1.
[6]
D De Pablo, FJ López, R. Martínez.
Salary costs and injury-related impact in professional basketball players.
Int J Sports Econ, 5 (2022), pp. 189-197
[7]
SH Doeven, MS Brink, BC Huijgen, Jong J de, KA. Lemmink.
Managing load to optimize well-being and recovery during short-term match congestion in elite basketball.
Int J Sports Physiol Perform, 16 (2021), pp. 45-50
[8]
MC Drakos, B Domb, C Starkey, L Callahan, AA. Allen.
Injury in the national basketball association: A 17-year overview.
Sports Health, 2 (2010), pp. 284-290
[9]
J Ekstrand, M Hägglund, M. Waldén.
Epidemiology of muscle injuries in professional football (soccer).
Am J Sports Med, 39 (2011), pp. 1226-1232
[10]
TJ Gabbett, S. Ullah.
Relationship between running loads and soft-tissue injury in elite team sport athletes.
J Strength Cond Res, 26 (2012), pp. 953-960
[11]
V Moreno-Pérez, J Ruiz, J Vazquez-Guerrero, G Rodas, J. Del Coso.
Training and competition injury epidemiology in professional basketball players: a prospective observational study.
Phys Sportsmed, 51 (2023), pp. 121-128
[12]
JW Orchard, K Rae, JA Feller.
OSICS v10.1: upgrading a sports injury classification.
Sports Injury J, (2020),
[13]
L Pulici, D Certa, M Zago, P Volpi, F. Esposito.
Injury burden in professional European football (soccer): systematic review, meta-analysis, and economic considerations.
Clin J Sport Med, 33 (2023), pp. 450-457
[14]
G Rodas, L Capdevila, M. Casals.
La incidencia de lesiones en jugadores profesionales de baloncesto en temporadas con alta congestión de partidos.
Apunts Med Esport, 54 (2019), pp. 57-64
[15]
N Sarlis, T Papadopoulos, E Georgiadis, D. Antoniou.
Salary management and injury-related costs in european professional basketball: a case study analysis.
Int J Sports Finance, 18 (2023), pp. 112-125
[16]
NJ Vaudreuil, CF Van Eck, SJ Lombardo, FD. Kharrazi.
Economic and performance impact of anterior cruciate ligament injury in national basketball association players.
Orthop J Sports Med, 9 (2021),
[17]
W Van Mechelen, H Hlobil, HC. Kemper.
Incidence, severity, aetiology, and prevention of sports injuries: a review of concepts.
Download PDF
Apunts Sports Medicine
Article options
Tools
Supplemental materials

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?